Plain language summary
Male factor infertility is characterised by the existence of suboptimal sperm parameters in the male partner of childbearing age and is presently defined as the inability to conceive a child with frequent and unprotected sexual intercourse in the fertile phase of the menstrual cycles for a year or longer. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 1 or more of the selected types of exercise interventions (moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), resistance training (RT), combined aerobic and resistance training (CET), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT)) in the prevention and treatment of male factor infertility. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials representing 18 groups (11 exercise, 7 non-intervention control [NON-EX]) and 2641 participants and/or patients (1429 exercise, 1212 NON-EX). Results show that in the setting of couples with male factor infertility, when compared with the NON-EX group, selected types of exercise interventions improved the relative risk of pregnancy rate in the following order: CET > MICT > RT > HICT > HIIT. The top-ranking interventions for live birth rate were for MICT, RT, HIIT, CET, and HICT. In addition, the interventions with the highest probability of being the best approach out of all available options in improving semen quality parameters were for CET, MICT, HICT, RT, and HIIT. Authors conclude that when clinicians are formulating clinical recommendations for preventing and treating male factor infertility, the findings of this study should be considered.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For couples with male factor infertility, this review recommends moderate intensity-aerobic exercise in combination with strength training to be the intervention with the highest probability of being the best approach for reproductive health benefits.
- A conservative interpretation of the findings is required because they were based on single studies.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
The World Health Organisation estimates that infertility affects 10% to 15% of couples in industrialised countries. Approximately 50% of all infertility cases are attributed to male-related factors, in particular, poor semen quality (called male factor infertility). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise training on male factor infertility and seminal markers of inflammation.
Methods
This is the first study to undertake a systematic review with network meta-analysis of 7 RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness of 1 or more types of exercise interventions on male factor infertility and seminal markers of inflammation, as well as to provide clinicians with a ranking of treatments to inform them of the treatment effects of exercise training and physical activity.
The forms of exercise include: moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), resistance training (RT), combined aerobic and resistance training (CET), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT).
7 RCTs representing 18 groups (11 exercise (supervised, not home-based), 7 non-intervention control [NON-EX]) and 2641 participants and/or patients (1429 exercise, 1212 NON-EX). All the RCTs were conducted in Iran involving healthy adult participants and/or infertile patients (with doctor-diagnosed male factor infertility). The intervention period was ≥10 weeks with a follow-up period.
None of the studies reported changes in either patients’ dietary intakes or normal daily physical activities and lifestyles during the intervention period.
Results
Compared with a non-intervention control group, the top ranking interventions:
For pregnancy rate:
Combined aerobic and resistance training (CET) (p= 0.89 relative risk [RR] = 27.81), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (p=0.87, RR = 26.67), resistance training (RT) (p=0.61,RR = 12.54), high intensity continuous training (HICT) (p=0.34, RR = 5.55), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) (p=0.28, RR = 4.63).
For live birth rate:
MICT (p=0.82, RR = 10.05), RT (p=0.70, RR = 4.92), HIIT (p=0.66, RR = 4.38)), CET (p=0.45, RR = 2.20), and HICT (p=0.30, RR = 1.55)
The following parameters/markers rank the 5 exercise strategies in order of effectiveness:
- Semen quality parameters were significantly improved after the following types of exercise interventions as compared with the non-intervention group [NON-EX]: CET > MICT > HICT > RT > HIIT
- The following training strategies were significantly better at improving seminal markers of oxidative stress: CET > MICT > HIIT > HICT > RT
- The following training strategies were significantly better at improving seminal markers of inflammation: CET > MICT > HIIT > RT > HICT
- The following training strategies were significantly better at improving measures of body composition and VO2 max: CET > HICT > MICT > HIIT > RT
- There was insufficient evidence of a difference for the selected types of exercise interventions versus NON-EX group for pregnancy and live birth rates in healthy participants.
Conclusion
Combined aerobic and resistance training (CET) was found to be the intervention with the highest probability of being the best approach for improving the male factor infertility.
Clinical practice applications:
- In light of these findings, it is reasonable to propose that infertile men and at-risk populations take part in the top-ranking interventions identified in this analysis.
- For substantial reproductive health benefits, one should consider doing all of the selected types of exercise interventions (CET, MICT, RT, HICT, and HIIT); however, moderate intensity-aerobic exercise and strength training in combination would generally be more favourable to lend clinically significant improvements.
- To add to this, exercise can offer a myriad of other health benefits, is a possibly safe activity and a cost-effective treatment strategy for male factor infertility.
Considerations for future research:
- There was only a small number of relevant trials available for comparison suggesting the need for additional study in this field.
- Further trials are needed to analyse the dose-response impacts of exercise modalities on male reproductive function.
- The results propose several domains for development in the reporting of RCTs addressing the impacts of interventional exercise studies on male reproductive function.
- Heterogeneity of some findings and discrepancy across the included studies was significant. For example, variations in the characteristics of training programs. Future analyses should aim to continue to address this.
- There is a concern that this study may not relate to already active patients with male factor infertility which future studies should address.
Abstract
CONTEXT Mounting evidence from the literature suggests that different types of training interventions can be successful at improving several aspects of male reproductive function in both fertile and infertile populations. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise training on male factor infertility and seminal markers of inflammation. DATA SOURCES We searched PubMed, CISCOM, Springer, Elsevier Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, PEDro, Ovid (Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO), Sport Discus, Orbis, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the impacts of selected types of exercise interventions on markers of male reproductive function and reproductive performance. STUDY SELECTION A total of 336 records were identified, of which we included 7 trials reporting on 2641 fertile and infertile men in the systematic review and network meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 1 (because this is a systematic review of RCTs). DATA EXTRACTION The data included the study design, participant characteristics, inclusion and exclusion, intervention characteristics, outcome measures, and the main results of the study. RESULTS The results of network meta-analysis showed that, compared with a nonintervention control group, the top-ranking interventions for pregnancy rate were for combined aerobic and resistance training (CET) (relative risk [RR] = 27.81), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (RR = 26.67), resistance training (RT) (RR = 12.54), high-intensity continuous training (HICT) (RR = 5.55), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) (RR = 4.63). While the top-ranking interventions for live birth rate were for MICT (RR = 10.05), RT (RR = 4.92), HIIT (RR = 4.38), CET (RR = 2.20), and HICT (RR = 1.55). Also, with the following order of effectiveness, 5 training strategies were significantly better at improving semen quality parameters (CET > MICT > HICT > RT > HIIT), seminal markers of oxidative stress (CET > MICT > HIIT > HICT > RT), seminal markers of inflammation (CET > MICT > HIIT > RT > HICT), as well as measures of body composition and VO2max (CET > HICT > MICT > HIIT > RT). CONCLUSION The review recommends that the intervention with the highest probability of being the best approach out of all available options for improving the male factor infertility was for CET.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
